![The ethics and barriers for Islamic finance in Africa’s economic development [+video]](https://muslimviews.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/B20-Part-2-360x180.webp)
![Islamic finance at the first African G20 [+video]](https://muslimviews.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/B20-Part-1-360x180.webp)
This war against Iran is real. The Mossad and the CIA manufacture the justification for it. The IAEA is just a front for these intelligence agencies.
By MOGAMAT REDERWAAN CRAAYENSTEIN
This article contains references to topics that have led to fatalities. We usually say that the truth shall set you free. In this issue, the truth will get you killed.
I read somewhere that if you see something that is wrong, then do something about it. If you cannot do that, then speak out. If you cannot do that, then at least feel something in your heart. We seem to live in a world where people are so afraid of the superpower in imperial decline and little Israel that they do not even have the feeling in their hearts. There is the fear that if it comes out that they hate what is happening, then they might be put on Trump’s naughty chair or face accusations of anti-Semitism from the well-organised Zionist lobby.
It is always instructive to revisit the origins of our most cherished ideas. We live in a world where lies parade as truth.
Israel is the only country with nuclear weapons in the Middle East. Israel has been killing nuclear scientists from neighbouring countries since the 1950s and bombing nuclear installations since 1981. Iraq (1981), Syria (2007) and Iran (2025). The same countries with whom Iran has negotiated the JCPOA (2015) and the ones who have nothing to say about Israel’s nuclear weapons, support Israel bombing Iran. If one were to look at mainstream media and the big governments of the world, people could be made to believe that Iran is the only country in the Middle East with nuclear weapons and that it poses a threat to its neighbours, especially Israel.
Iran has been in nuclear negotiations with the same President Trump who unilaterally tore up the JCPOA. Why was Trump negotiating? What informed Trump’s negotiating stance? Did truth matter to Trump?
Does truth matter?
Do the USA, EU, and UK negotiate to resolve their disagreements? Because if they do that, then the truth should matter. Are they in negotiations to advance their colonial and imperial power plays, or does truth play any role? If truth were non-negotiable, it would mean that all parties would have to set aside their assumptions and presuppositions. all relevant aspects should be subject to critical scrutiny.
If truth matters, then presuppositions that Muslims are terrorists, the only good Muslim is a dead Muslim, any criticism of Israel is anti-Semitic, that Israel’s right to self-defence trumps the rights of everyone else, and that the only victims in history were Jews during the Holocaust.
If truth were the goal during negotiations or ceasefires, the outcome would not be determined by who wins and who loses. The result must be contingent on having let go of the assumption that white Europeans are the only human beings, in fact, the only beings that matter. It means that the dogmas that Israel, the USA, the EU and the UK have when it comes to dealing with Muslims must be subject to critical examination. It would mean that the Muslim on the other side of the negotiation is not an enemy but someone with whom one disagrees.
Perspectives on truth
Negotiations from a utilitarian perspective would look at outcomes that get =s agreement from the maximum number of people. One examines the negotiations and ceasefires, observing that a majority of people in the Global South and at the UN General Assembly, comprising 193 member states, typically vote in one way, while the USA, UK, EU, and Israel, together, vote in another way on most issues. If we examine peace talks and ceasefires from a perspective inspired by Immanuel Kant, we consider the categorical imperative for moral consistency. One cannot argue that the other side has to abide by the law, and the USA and its allies are above the law. One cannot say that Israel has the right of self-defence and deny that right to every other state in the region. From a Kantian perspective- the categorical imperative- how Israel and the USA negotiate is logically inconsistent, thus immoral.
On the other hand, one could also approach the search for facts, the truth, and the falsity of the substance of negotiations and peace agreements from the perspective of natural law, which is that which we can know rationally without any supplementary aids, such as revelation. As rational human beings, we can acquire data, analyse it, and understand these findings to make a judgement. Based on this approach, we could find it hard to understand why Israel and the USA are in a category of their own in terms of rights and duties, and the rest of the parties, be they Palestinians, Lebanese, Syrians, Iraqis, Yemenis or Iranians.
If we examine how the Israelis and Americans negotiate and make agreements, we see that it is at odds with something I read elsewhere. I read that when you call to your way of seeing things, use wisdom, frame positions in ways that are appealing, and if you debate (disagree), do so in the most elegant and respectful ways. Now this is how I expect the Palestinians, Iranians and Qataris to negotiate. They are creatures formed from threads woven by the Prophets of the Bible and the Quran. They are not Sahabas (companions and followers) of Thrasymachus, who believe that might is right.
Do not cover the truth with falsehood
I also read that the truth has arrived, and falsehood has perished. For falsehood, by its nature, must perish. We are told not to cover the truth with falsehood, nor conceal the truth when you know what it is.
We see how one enters negotiations for ending wars and agreeing to ceasefires when truth is the organising principle. It changes the way one approaches the processes. Truth shapes one’s state of mind and underpins the behaviours of those who seek it. When truth matters, then we let go of dogmatism, e.g. Israel has the right to self-defence. We let go of the idea that Israel is above international law, conventions and covenants, that Israel is exempt from compliance with international human rights law and humanitarian law. When truth matters, the person on the other side is not an enemy.
Manufactured truth
However, we live in an era when truth is not necessarily to be discovered neutrally. We have seen how the truth/falsehood of Iran being close to having a nuclear weapon almost led to a nuclear war. One thing is sure: Israel was winning the aerial war, but it has never suffered infrastructural and civilian damages as it has in the last few days.
The IAEA has inspectors on the ground. That is not where the main facts are gathered. The IAEA also uses drones and an Artificial Intelligence platform to process its data.
Artificial Intelligence creates truth
The AI platform shall not be named so that Muslim Views does not need to spend money on legal fees to see whether the calling party could sue it for damages. What is certain is that the IAEA reached its decision because its AI platform generated the alerts. It was being fed alerts from a nuclear weapons country that is not subject to the NPT. The IAEA has no business dealing with this country. Yet this same country lies at the heart of the IAEA’s claims against Iran. No inspectors on the ground were asked to confirm or deny. Two intelligence agencies (Mossad and the CIA) have access to the AI platform,
The AI platform was revealing information that none of the inspectors on site had ever found. The AI platform had been corrupted. The data that appeared on the IAEA screens was too perfect. The inspectors on the ground had a view of the enriched uranium, and none of them had any reason for suspicion that Iran was breaching its protocols. What is strange is that Israel, which is an undeclared, unmonitored nuclear power and not a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), was seeking updates from the IAEA at the same time as the data was alerting to breaches by Iran. This is utterly insane. The truth was being manufactured at the IAEA, and the hands of Mossad and the CIA are all over the data. The Iranians knew it. They had the hacked data to prove collusion between the IAEA Secretary General and Israeli military and intelligence officials.
The IAEA was not working with raw data from Isfahan, Natanz, or Fordow. The data was being prepared for the IAEA by the CIA and the Mossad. The AI platform was sending out red alerts and recommending IAEA intervention. The IAEA was being grossly manipulated by an intelligence agency that should not have direct access to the IAEA at all.
In the days before Israel bombed Iran, the inspectors on the ground in Iran and IAEA officials in Vienna were on two different planets. In Vienna, the corridors of the IAEA were buzzing. The data does not lie. IAEA must intervene. The West must act against Iran. International law is irrelevant. Israel has the right to self-defence. This was being whispered in the hallways of the IAEA in Vienna. This is a body supposedly committed to truth and objective facts. Yet, lies were being manufactured by two foreign intelligence agencies. They own the algorithm.
Truth is what you can get away with
As opposed to Socrates, Bentham, Nietzsche, Kant, the prophets of the Bible and Quran, Richard Rorty said that the truth is what your opponents let you get away with. This is the position of the IAEA, the CIA and the Mossad. The truth of the allegations against Iran is what AI platforms’ algorithm tortures out of the data. The data itself is a fabrication.
Those inside the IAEA who tried to question the data were told, “This is above your pay grade”. The IAEA, the USA, the EU, the CIA and the Mossad know that the IAEA report is based on a pack of lies. It is manufactured, masquerading as truth. They own the algorithm, and they manufacture a justification for bombing Iran. That is the bottom line.
The IAEA has manufactured the case for bombing Iran. It is not a neutral body that carries out the wishes of the United Nations in the area of nuclear non-proliferation. It is the handmaiden of at least two, if not five, intelligence agencies.
There were meetings at the IAEA before the bombing that involved Israeli partners. The owners of the AI platform, IAEA senior staff, and members of the intelligence agencies involved were committed to trusting the AI platform and its manipulated data, which it fed into intelligence. This is the Guantanamo Bay of Vienna. This was the Abu Ghraib torture of atomic data. The IAEA is not independent.
The same AI platform is used in Gaza
The company that owns the AI platform also has a contract with the Israeli Defence Force. The 2024 board meeting took place in Tel Aviv.
The same AI platform is used in Gaza. 2 million people and 360 square kilometres of data. That data is used to determine targets in Gaza. The algorithm does not work on actual suspects who commit real crimes. The algorithm frames the person as a potential target likely to commit a terrorist act. For Gaza, the assumptions of the white people who drew up the algorithm take one’s breath away.
There is no distinction between the intelligence agencies in Israel and the USA, and the owners of the AI platform.
At the IAEA, the AI algorithm was manipulated by the CIA and Mossad. In 2021 the system collated data, analysed the data and flagged anomalies after the data had been analysed.
After 2021, the AI platform alerted the IAEA about Iranian violations before the IAEA inspectors even left Vienna for Iran. Iran was being set up by the CIA and Mossad from 2021, and the IAEA knew about it. If Grossi claims that he was unaware, then he should resign, as he was incompetent. We can remember that Secretary Colin Powell went to the United Nations to present manufactured intelligence about non-existent Iraqi weapons of mass destruction.
Mossad and the CIA made primary inputs to the IAEA AI platform
There is a close correlation between Mossad’s concerns about Iran and the alerts on the AI platform. Israeli concerns were reflected in IAEA data before IAEA inspectors even left for Iran. Israel controls the IAEA AI platform; there is no doubt about it.
An AI platform is only as clever as the data on which it was trained. The platform was trained on data that Mossad allegedly stole from Iran in 2018. The original documents are not verifiable. They are likely fake documents to be fed to the AI platform of the IAEA. This attack in Iran was planned as early as 2018. The AI platform used data to form a picture of the Iranian nuclear programme. That data was obtained from Mossad, and the AI platform assumed the data to be true. The IAEA intelligence platform operates on assumptions similar to those of the Mossad and CIA about how the world works. Truth does not matter.
The IAEA report that accuses Iran of having 400 kg of 60% enriched uranium is not based on facts from inspection by IAEA experts. It is based on manufactured data fed by Mossad to the owners of the AI platform used by the IAEA,
When the first bombs fell on Iran, the Iranians blamed the owners of the AI platform. The Iranians had hacked data to back their claim. The Russians and Chinese expressed concerns about the role of commercial verification AI platforms in use at multilateral bodies. In a digital world, verification is bought and sold. Verification was no longer neutral. It was weaponised.
At the UN Security Council, Israel expressed confidence in the IAEA and the AI platform used for verification. Remember that the CIA and Mossad control this programme at least at the IAEA. There were no eyewitnesses, no on-the-ground inspectors, no buzzing radiation equipment. It was only an algorithm that was manipulated by two intelligence agencies and a Secretary General who was their spokesperson.
Everyone who operates at this high level of diplomacy knew that this was a war that was being justified by an algorithm. Drug merchants and cartels take their money and launder it through legitimate businesses to end up in the banking system.
A whistleblower on the run
This information was obtained from the accounts of an insider at the owners of the AI platform. This person is now an international fugitive, for having committed a crime like Eric Snowden, Chelsea Manning, Julian Assange and Daniel Ellsberg.
In a digital world, verification does not require truth. The algorithm determines the truth. The prophets of the Bible and the Quran, Socrates, Bentham and Kant are powerless against the AI platforms that intelligence agencies access. This is the exact reason why we are so polarised as people. We spend so much time in our own lane, our own echo chambers, as the AI algorithm shapes who we are, how we think, and how we behave. And who we must hate and go to war with. Strangely, other Muslim countries in the Middle East hesitate to do anything about Israel’s nuclear weapons. They say that if Iran gets a bomb, then they will do the same. Mossad and the CIA are pulling their strings on this issue, and their sectarian blinkers make them blind to the truth.
This war against Iran is real. The Mossad and the CIA manufacture the justification for it. The IAEA is just a front for these intelligence agencies.
